|
|
|
¹ÚÇö¿µ ( Park Hyun-Young ) - È£³²´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú
Àå±Ý¼º ( Jang Keum-Seong ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ ÃÖÀÚÀ± ( Choi Ja-Yun ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ °£È£´ëÇÐ ±èÀ±Èñ ( Kim Yun-Hee ) - ±¹¸³¸ñÆ÷´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
Purpose: To implement evidence-based nursing, it is important to know where and how to find the best available evidence. This study was conducted to identify the results of a search from Ovid MEDLINE and to compare the results from Ovid MEDLINE with those from PubMed MEDLINE.
Methods: Four different approaches via Ovid MEDLINE were used to search for guidelines on preventing catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Outcomes of this study were the number of records and relevant literature, and the sensitivity and precision of the search methods via Ovid MEDLINE.
Results: The number of retrieved items ranged 23 to 6,005 and that of relevant studies, 5 to 8 of 8. Simple searches resulted in the highest sensitivity of 100.0%. When using MeSH terms and limits feature, the precision was highest (21.7%) among four approaches for literature searches. Simple searches in Ovid had higher sensitivity and lower precision than those in PubMed.
Conclusion: Simple searches in Ovid may be inefficient for busy clinicians compared to PubMed. However, to ensure a comprehensive and systematic literature search, using Ovid MEDLINE in addition to PubMed is recommended.
|
|
KeyWords
|
|
±Ù°Å±â¹Ý°£È£, °¡À̵å¶óÀÎ, µµ´¢°ü, ¿ä·Î°¨¿°
Evidence-based nursing, Ovid, Guidelines, Urinary catheterization, Urinary tract infections
|
|
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
|
|
|
|
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
|
|
|
|
|
|